OOIDA v. US Dep't of Transp., No. 15-2090 (8th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CasePetitioners, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association and one of its members, seek review of regulatory guidance issued by the FMCSA, which exempts from federal accident-reporting regulations certain accidents involving commercial motor vehicles known as attenuator trucks. The court dismissed the petition for lack of an Article III case or controversy because petitioners have failed to identify a concrete and particularized injury that would give them standing to proceed.
Court Description: Colloton, Author, with Gruender and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Action of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Petitioners have failed to identify a concrete and particularized injury that would give them standing to challenge guidance from the Administration's guidance which exempts from federal accident-reporting regulations certain accidents involving commercial motor vehicles known as attenuator trucks, and the petition is dismissed for lack of an Article III case or controversy.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.