Lemuz-Hernandez v. Lynch, No. 14-3873 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CasePetitioner, a citizen and national of Honduras, petitioned for review of the BIA's affirmance of the IJ's denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Petitioner claimed that the IJ and the BIA failed to consider evidence of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship his children would suffer if he were removed from the United States. The court concluded that petitioner's challenge to the agency’s weighing of the evidence in support of his claim for cancellation of removal is outside the court's jurisdiction to review. The court concluded, though the agency’s consideration of the particular hardship factors that petitioner believed decisive may have been perfunctory, that is insufficient to establish legal or constitutional error. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Court Description: Per Curiam. Before Wollman, Colloton, and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - immigration. Petition for review from denial of cancellation of removal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petition challenges the agency's weighing of evidence in support of the claim and not legal or constitutional error.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.