Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Weiher, No. 14-3098 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment allowing Northwestern to rescind a disability insurance policy. The court concluded that Northwestern’s evidence is insufficient to show that it is entitled to summary judgment because the evidence does not address the specific insurance policy at issue in this case. The court concluded that the issue is whether, after the policy went into effect, the failure to cancel the policy increased the risk at the time of the loss, i.e., when plaintiff became disabled and made a claim for benefits. Even if a general aversion to over-insurance is sufficient to prove that plaintiff's breach of his promise to cancel the Great-West policy increased the risk to Northwestern, it does not address whether his breach increased the risk at the time of loss. As to Northwestern's alternative argument, the court concluded that there appears to remain a factual dispute concerning whether plaintiff knew or should have known that the representation at issue was false or was made with intent to deceive. Accordingly, the court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Court Description: Kelly, Author, with Loken and Bye, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Insurance. The district court erred in granting Northwestern summary judgment allowing it to rescind a disability policy issued to the defendant; defendant's failure to cancel a prior policy did not increase Northwestern's risk at the time of the loss. Judge Loken, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.