George Robinson v. Option One Mortgage Corp., No. 14-1312 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Real Estate Settlement Procedures and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Defendant's summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 13-3735 ___________________________ George C. Robinson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant Elizabeth C. Robinson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff v. Option One Mortgage Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ___________________________ No. 14-1312 ___________________________ George C. Robinson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant Elizabeth C. Robinson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff v. Option One Mortgage Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith ____________ Submitted: October 2, 2014 Filed: October 3, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, George Robinson challenges the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment, and denial of post-judgment relief, in this action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures and Fair Debt Collection Practices Acts. Upon careful de novo review, see Rochling v. Dep t of Veterans Affairs, 725 F.3d 927, 937 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper, because the claims are time-barred, see 12 U.S.C. § 2614; 15 U.S.C. § 1692(k); and we also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see Noah Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
