United States v. Omar, No. 13-2195 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseOmar was charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, 18 U.S.C. 2339A(a); providing material support to terrorists; conspiracy to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization, 18 U.S.C. 2339B(a)(1); providing material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization; and conspiracy to murder, kidnap, and maim persons outside of the United States, 18 U.S.C. 956(a)(1). Omar moved to suppress any identification evidence. A magistrate judge held a hearing and recommended that Omar’s motion be granted, finding that the pre-trial identification technique used three witnesses was impermissibly suggestive because it amounted to a single-photograph identification and that repeated displays of Omar’s picture “served to dispel any hesitation the witnesses may have had in their original identification[s].” The district court rejected the recommendation and denied Omar’s motion, stating these witnesses “were sufficiently familiar with the Defendant to provide an accurate identification.” The court also denied a motion for disclosure or suppression of evidence obtained from electronic surveillance conducted pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50 U.S.C.1801. The Eighth Circuit affirmed his conviction, upholding admission of testimony by a government terrorism expert concerning global jihad and the court's evidentiary rulings.
Court Description: Gruender, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Because the witnesses who were already familiar with defendant were asked an open-ended question about whether they knew him, the identification technique uses here did not create a substantial likelihood of misidentification, and the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress the witnesses' identifications of him at trial; the district court did not err in determining not to disclose FISA materials to defendant and not to suppress the FISA-derived evidence that was admitted at trial; no error in admitting testimony from the government's expert witness on terrorism on the links between al Shabaab and other terror groups and global jihad, as the evidence was relevant and its probative value was not outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.