Cabrera v. Holder, Jr., No. 13-2178 (8th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CasePetitioner, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitioned for review of a decision of the BIA dismissing his appeal from the IJ's order of removal. Petitioner admitted that the tampering with evidence conviction justified his removal. However, he argued that res judicata barred DHS from bringing the removal proceedings against him because the tampering with evidence conviction arose from the same nucleus of operative fact as the manslaughter conviction. The court concluded that petitioner's manslaughter and tampering with evidence convictions are two different causes of action that arose out of different facts, required different proof, and redressed different wrongs. Therefore, assuming without deciding that res judica principles applied to immigration proceedings, the requisite elements are not present and the removal proceedings are not barred. Accordingly, the court denied the petition for review.
Court Description: Petition for Review - Immigration (OMAHA IMMIGRATION COURT). While this circuit has yet to determine whether res judicata applies in immigration cases, it is not necessary to resolve the issue because petitioner cannot satisfy the res judicata elements as the two convictions relied on in the two administrative proceedings (manslaughter and witness tampering) arose out of different facts, require different proof and redress different wrongs, and a removal proceeding based on the tampering conviction is not barred by the BIA's determination in an earlier proceeding that petitioner could not be removed based on his manslaughter conviction.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.