United States v. Landsdown, No. 12-3732 (8th Cir. 2013)Annotate this Case
Defendant appealed his conviction for receiving child pornography. The credibility of the testimony at issue was for the jury, and the jury reasonably could have concluded that the government eliminated other potential recipients of the child pornography. Therefore, the court concluded that a reasonable jury could find that defendant knowingly received child pornography. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment and concluded that the evidence was sufficient to convict defendant.