Maumelle Medical Clinics, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores Arkansas, LLC, No. 12-1579 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil Case - 42 U.S.C. secs. 1981 and 1982. District court's adverse grant of summary judgment is summarily affirmed without comment. No abuse of discretion in exercise of supplemental jurisdiction.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-1579 ___________________________ Maumelle Medical Clinics, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wal-Mart Stores Arkansas, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville ____________ Submitted: October 30, 2012 Filed: November 16, 2012 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Maumelle Medical Clinics, Inc. (Maumelle) appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in its action under 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 1981 and 1982 1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. and state law. Upon de novo review, see Withers v. Dick s Sporting Goods, Inc., 636 F.3d 958, 962 (8th Cir.) (summary judgment), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 821 (2011), we find no basis for reversal as to the grant of summary judgment on the section 1981 and 1982 claims. We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court s exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims after dismissing the federal claims. See Quinn v. Ocwen Fed. Bank FSB, 470 F.3d 1240, 1249 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). The district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
