James Warford v. United Parcel Service, No. 11-1250 (8th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - civil procedure. On its face the complaint in the matter sufficiently demonstrated that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional amount, and the district court did not err in denying plaintiff's motion to remand the case to state court.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-1250 ___________ James Kevin Warford, Appellant, v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Appellee. * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * ___________ Submitted: August 4, 2011 Filed: August 11, 2011 ___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas resident James Warford appeals the district court s1 denial of his motion to remand his diversity action against United Parcel Service, Inc., which had been removed from Arkansas state court. After careful de novo review, see In re Prempro Prods. Liab. Litig., 591 F.3d 613, 619 (8th Cir. 2010), we conclude that, on its face, the complaint sufficiently demonstrated that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional amount. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The HONORABLE JIMM LARRY HENDREN, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
