Rickie Green v. Larry Norris, et al, No. 07-1482 (8th Cir. 2008)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Prisoner case - prisoner civil rights. Dismissal of prisoner's Section 1983 excessive force suit affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1482 ___________ Rickie Green, * * Appellant. * * v. * * Larry B. Norris, Director, * Arkansas Department of Correction, * * Appellee, * * Robert Jackson, Former * Assistant Warden, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC, * * Defendant, * * Ray Hobbs, Chief Deputy Director, * Arkansas Department of Correction; * Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Dennis Jackson, * Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, * ADC; Ms. Stewart, Sgt., East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; L. Jones, * Corporal, East Arkansas Regional * Unit, ADC; Mr. A. Norton, Corporal, * East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; * Mr. Eastern, Corporal, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Mr. Cleaster * Hubbard, Corporal, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Mr. Morrison, * Corporal, East Arkansas * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. [UNPUBLISHED] Regional Unit, ADC, Appellees. * * * ___________ Submitted: November 4, 2008 Filed: November 7, 2008 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Rickie Green appeals the district court s1 dismissal, following a pretrial evidentiary hearing, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming defendants used excessive force against him in violation of the Eighth Amendment. After careful review, we find that the district court did not err in dismissing the action. See Randle v. Parker, 48 F.3d 301, 303 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review; court must resolve direct factual conflicts in favor of plaintiff, assume as true all facts supporting plaintiff which evidence tends to prove, and give plaintiff benefit of all reasonable inferences; inquiry is whether evidence so viewed would allow reasonable jurors to differ as to conclusions that could be drawn); Johnson v. Bi-State Justice Ctr., 12 F.3d 133, 13536 (8th Cir. 1993) (hearing to determine whether pro se inmate s § 1983 damages claims warrant jury trial is permitted, but hearing must be consistent with right to jury trial; standard is whether case would survive motion for judgment as matter of law). 1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Green s motion for appellate counsel is denied. ______________________________ -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
