USA v. William Kimbrell, No. 07-1055 (8th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. Case remanded to permit the district court to rule on defendant's Rule 4(b)(4) motion.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1055 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. William Glenn Kimbrell, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: December 13, 2007 Filed: December 19, 2007 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. William Glenn Kimbrell seeks to appeal the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Kimbrell s notice of appeal was untimely filed twenty-nine days after judgment was entered. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). An accompanying motion, however, requested leave to file the notice of appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Procedure 4(b)(4), which authorizes the district court, before or after the time has expired, with or without motion and notice, to extend the appeal period for up to 30 days [u]pon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause. Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court to rule on the Rule 4(b)(4) motion. See United States v. Petty, 82 F.3d 809, 810 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). The district court should return the case to this court after the pending motion is resolved. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
