James Hedman Clark v. Tom A. Mickes, No. 06-3135 (8th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil Case - civil rights. District court's dismissal of civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim is summarily affirmed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3135 ___________ James Hedman Clark, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Tom A. Mickes, former SSD attorney; * The Law Firm, formerly known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Mickes, Tueth, Kenney, Cooper, * Mohan & Jackstadt; Special School * District; Francis Howell School * District, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: December 11, 2007 Filed: December 27, 2007 ___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. James Hedman Clark appeals the district court s1 dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir. 2007), we agree with the district court that Clark failed to state a claim upon which 1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees motions to strike, and we deny Clark s pending motions. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
