S. Keith Curran v. Washington Mutual, No. 06-1911 (8th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Defendant's judgment affirmed without comment. See Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (8th Cir. 2006).
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1911 ___________ S. Keith Curran; Rhonda Curran, Appellants, v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., Appellee. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. * * [PUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: November 17, 2006 Filed: December 18, 2006 ___________ Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. ยง 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim. Affirmed. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
