United States v. Filzen, No. 20-1071 (7th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Filzen robbed seven Indianapolis stores while brandishing a firearm. He pleaded guilty to seven counts of Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. 1951(a), and four counts of brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, section 924(c)(1)(a)(ii). The government dismissed three brandishing counts and moved for a three‐level sentence reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The plea agreement states that “if the Court accepts this plea agreement, the Court will sentence the defendant within the specific sentencing range set forth" and contains a sentencing range of 360-420 months’ imprisonment and payment of $900.00, “the mandatory special assessment fees imposed” under 18 U.S.C. 3013
The district court discussed with Filzen that “[t]here will be a special mandatory assessment of $100 for each count. The total is $900.” Filzen responded that he agreed. The court imposed a sentence of 360 months’ imprisonment but ordered that “Defendant shall pay a mandatory special assessment fee of $100 per count for a total of $1,100” without acknowledging the $200 discrepancy. No one noticed the mistake. Filzen appealed his sentence on the basis of the $200 difference in his special assessment and the fact that the district court did not offer him the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea under Rule 11. The Seventh Circuit affirmed. On plain‐error review, the imposition of the correct, statutorily mandated special assessment although it differs by $200 from that in Filzen’s plea agreement need not be undone.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.