United States v. Hathaway, No. 17-1823 (7th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseHathaway, then 44, was convicted of knowingly transporting a minor (then 13) across state lines to engage in criminal sexual activity and of traveling between states to do so, 18 U.S.C. 2423(a). The PSR recommended that Hathaway pay $4,489 in restitution, including $1,089 for the girl’s counseling expenses, $3,100 for costs incurred in relocating her to California after she was found at Hathaway’s home, and $300 for the costs of retrieving the girl’s belongings from Hathaway’s home. Hathaway opposed the inclusion of the victim’s counseling expenses. Hathaway’s attorney confirmed that he had no further objections. The district court denied Hathaway’s objection, citing the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA), 18 U.S.C. 3663A; imposed a 400‐month prison term; and ordered Hathaway to pay $4,489 as restitution. The Seventh Circuit affirmed. The court rejected, as waived, Hathaway’s arguments that relocation expenses were not directly related to his criminal conduct and that the retrieval expenses were not properly supported in the record. Hathaway knew of his right to object and stated on the record that he had no further objections. Whatever the strategic thinking might have been at the time, the fact that Hathaway challenged some, but not all, of the restitution calculations, while expressly declining to raise other objections, exhibits intentional relinquishment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.