USA v. Deangelo Anderson, No. 16-3112 (7th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 2, 2018.
Download PDF
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued November 7, 2017 Decided May 16, 2018 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge No. 16 3112 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. DEANGELO ANDERSON, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 2:14 cr 00186 LA 2 Lynn Adelman, Judge. O R D E R Deangelo Anderson filed an appeal from his conviction and sentence, and on February 2, 2018 we upheld his conviction but ordered a limited remand as to his sentence so that the district court could determine whether it would have imposed the same sentence knowing that it could consider the mandatory sentence in light of Dean v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1170 (2017). The district court responded that it would have imposed the same sentence, and we provided the parties an opportunity to respond. On May 9, 2018, the parties filed a joint statement agreeing that Anderson’s argument regarding Dean has been resolved and stating that, because we had already rejected Anderson’s other arguments, the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. We agree. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
