United States v. Rahman, No. 13-1586 (7th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseA building that housed the Café, other restaurants, and 10 apartments burned to the ground. The Cafe’s owner, Rahman, signed a consent form that allowed investigators to look for the “origin and cause” of the fire. Investigators performed a line search looking for a laptop and safe that Rahman told investigators were in the basement, but found neither. Based on the absence of the laptop, the presence of gasoline, and other evidence, investigators settled on arson as the cause of the fire. Rahman was charged with arson and lying to investigators about the location of the laptop. He was acquitted of the arson counts, but convicted of providing false statements to the government. The Seventh Circuit reversed, finding that evidence from the basement line search should have been suppressed as exceeding the scope of Rahman’s consent. The investigators had already ruled out the basement as the origin of the fire when they conducted the search. Their only purpose was to find secondary and circumstantial evidence of arson, which exceeded the scope of Rahman’s consent. The fact that one of Rahman’s computers was found at his home and did not contain business records was not sufficient to find him guilty of the charged false statement.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.