United States v. Knope, No. 10-2824 (7th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseDefendant was convicted of possession of child pornography and attempting to entice a minor to engage in a sexual act (18 U.S.C. 2252(a)(4)(B) and 2422(b)). The Seventh Circuit affirmed. The trial court acted within its discretion in: denying a motion to suppress; admitting evidence regarding prior online chats with individuals who purported to be minors; and denying requested jury instructions. Defendant had been arrested and was seated in a police car when an officer asked where he lived before reciting Miranda rights; there was no evidence that the officer was seeking an admission and there is no precedent that revealing one's residence during booking, thereby identifying a place to search, was sufficient to invoke Miranda. Defendant consented to the search of his residence. The district court should have given explicit reasons for its conclusion that prior evidence was not unfairly prejudicial rather than making reference to another similar case, but any error was harmless in light of abundant evidence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.