1995 Sixth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 1501 - 2000 of 2001

United States, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Mark White, Defendant-appellant
Date: February 6, 1995
Citation: 46 F.3d 1132
Philip Bartling; Lee E. Anthony; Jim Anon; Davidarmstrong; Carl Benefield; James Bushu; Don Capper;howard Collingsworth; Ron Craig; Lloyd Daugherty; Nelsondeane; Jerry Dement; Larry Donohue; Richard Dawson;philip Edwards; Sam Egger; James Fairchild; Williameinnell; Melvin Foster; Ernest Frazier; Larue Gregory;thedore Grinvalds; Robert Grubbs; John Geyer; Maxineharris; Harry Hartzell; Don Headlee; Richard Hines;darrel Holly; John Huffman; Dianne Jordan; Thomas Lease;robert Lovell; Michael Mason; Rick May; Ronald Mcbee;vaughn Mckee; William Monroe; Rodger Myers; David Ogle;larry Porter; Edward Pressnell; Betty Rooney; Williamsark; Ed Smith; James Standard; John Steiger; Thomasstevens; Walter Strange; James Vest; John Walters;robert Wilkerson; Thomas Wilkins; Robert Wilson, Jr.;stanley Woodhouse; Joseph Wren; William Zinkhorn; Johndotson; Linda Hartzell; Ronald C. Fitzwater; Caren S.lemaster; Jon Powers; John Yeatts; Don Rigney, Sr.; Donwarfield; Frank Wildman; Helen J. Ream; Eugene C. Haerr,jr.; Walter R. Egger; James Doyle; Carl White; Deborahcooke; Marlin Reynolds; Robert Burk; John L. Connors;merrie Lou Tindall; Roanna M. Griffith; and Carol S.palmer, Plaintiffs-appellants, Cross-appellees, v. Fruehauf Corporation; Kelsey-hayes Company; Retirementcommittee of Fruehauf Corporation; Plan Administrator Ofretirement Income Plan for Salaried Employees Ofkelsey-hayes Company; Retirement Income Plan for Salariedemployees of Kelsey-hayes Company; and Kelsey-hayes Companyseparation Allowance Plan for Salaried Employees Ofkelsey-hayes Company, Defendants-appellees, Cross-appellants,citibank, N.a.; Irving Trust Company, Trustee of Retirementincome Plan for Salaried Employees of Kelsey-hayescompany, Defendants
Date: January 17, 1995
Citation: 29 F.3d 1062

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.