Adams v. Hanson, No. 09-2045 (6th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CasePlaintiff, a witness in a gang-related racketeering case, was detained for 12 days, based on the prosecutor's representation to the trial court that plaintiff was unwilling to testify. She was not given an opportunity to be heard or to post bond. Entering judgment for the defendant in a case under 42 U.S.C. 1983, the district court held that the prosecutor was entitled to absolute immunity for conduct falling within her role as a prosecutor. The Sixth Circuit affirmed. When making statements at a preliminary examination about the availability of a witness, the prosecutor functioned as an advocate for the State of Michigan and performed acts intimately associated with the judicial process; she was absolutely immune from suit for her prosecutorial conduct.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.