Villarreal v. City of Laredo, No. 20-40359 (5th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on November 1, 2021.
Download PDF
` United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 28, 2022 No. 20-40359 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Priscilla Villarreal, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus The City of Laredo, Texas; Webb County, Texas; Isidro R. Alaniz; Marisela Jacaman; Claudio Trevino, Jr.; Juan L. Ruiz; Deyanria Villarreal; Enedina Martinez; Alfredo Guerrero; Laura Montemayor; Does 1-2, Defendants—Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:19-CV-48 ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion November 1, 2021, 5 Cir., 2021, 17 F.4th 532, withdrawn) (Opinion August 12, 2022, 5 Cir., 2022, 44 F.4th 363) Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. No. 20-40359 Per Curiam: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated August 12, 2022, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed September 9, 2022, is DENIED AS MOOT. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
