In Re: Bruce Webster, No. 20-10530 (5th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 20-10530 Document: 00515656601 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/01/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 20-10530 December 1, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk In re: Bruce Carneil Webster, Movant. Motion for an order authorizing the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas to consider a successive 28 U.S.C. §2255 application Before Willett, Ho, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Prisoner Bruce Carneil Webster moves this court for permission to file a successive habeas petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2), arguing that his conviction for using a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), is unconstitutional under United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). The felony offenses of kidnapping resulting in death and conspiracy to commit kidnapping of which Webster also was convicted were charged as predicates to his § 924(c) offense. 1 * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 1 Webster received a sentence of death for his kidnapping offense, life imprisonment for the conspiracy offense, and sixty months of imprisonment for the firearm offense. On September 22, 2020, however, the Seventh Circuit affirmed an Indiana federal Case: 20-10530 Document: 00515656601 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/01/2020 No. 20-10530 Section 924(c) defines a crime of violence in two alternative ways. Its “residual clause” defines a crime of violence as a felony “that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.” § 924(c)(3)(B). Its “elements clause” defines a crime of violence as a felony that “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another.” § 924(c)(3)(A). Davis declared the residual clause unconstitutionally vague but left the elements clause intact. Recently, in a matter involving Webster’s co-conspirator, Orlando Hall, we held that kidnapping resulting in death, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1202(a)(1), constitutes a crime of violence under § 924(c)’s elements clause. See In re Hall, 979 F.3d 339, 343–47 (5th Cir. 2020). Given our decision in In re Hall, Webster likewise fails to make the necessary prima facie showing that his underlying claim relies “on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2). Accordingly, Webster’s request for authorization to file a successive § 2255 petition is DENIED. district court’s vacatur of the death sentence based on a finding that Webster is intellectually disabled and thus, under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), constitutionally ineligible for a death sentence. See Webster v. Watson, 975 F.3d 667 (7th Cir. 2020). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
