United States v. Arellano-Banuelos, No. 17-11490 (5th Cir. 2019)Annotate this Case
Defendant appealed his conviction for illegal reentry. Because the district court's factual findings provided an inadequate basis for appellate review, the Fifth Circuit remanded for the district court to make additional findings as to whether defendant was "in custody" within the meaning of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). The court declined to reach the other issues raised on appeal at this time.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on June 17, 2019.