USA v. Jose Estrada-Carrizales, No. 16-40253 (5th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 16-40253 Document: 00513792638 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/12/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40253 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 12, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ESTRADA-CARRIZALES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CR-854-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose EstradaCarrizales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 1 Estrada-Carrizales has not filed a response. We Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * We conclude that the Court’s decision in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), issued after the FPD filed its brief, does not necessitate further briefing regarding the analysis of Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 644(D)(1). 1 Case: 16-40253 Document: 00513792638 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/12/2016 No. 16-40253 have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2