Stemcor USA Incorporated v. Cia Siderurgica do Par, No. 16-30984 (5th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 1, 2017.
Download PDF
Case: 16-30984 Document: 00514686940 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-30984 FILED October 17, 2018 STEMCOR USA INCORPORATED, Plaintiff v. CIA SIDERURGICA DO PARA COSIPAR, ET AL., Defendants ---------------------------------------------DAWEOO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellant v. THYSSENKRUPP MANNEX GMBH, Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee v. AMERICA METALS TRADING L.L.P., ET AL., Defendants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:12-CV-2966 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-30984 Document: 00514686940 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 No. 16-30984 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:* In Stemcor USA Inc. v. Cia Siderurgica do Para Cosipar, 870 F.3d 370, 372 (5th Cir. 2017), opinion withdrawn and superseded on reh’g, 895 F.3d 375 (5th Cir. 2018), we interpreted, inter alia, a matter of Louisiana law: whether the state non-resident attachment statute, La. Code Civ. Proc. art. 3542, allows for attachment in a suit to compel arbitration. A divided panel concluded that it does not, after reading the phrase “action for a money judgment” to exclude such a suit. This narrow issue of state statutory interpretation has divided judges on our court. While we regret the time that has passed, the parties’ separate rehearing petitions have convinced us that the precise meaning of the phrase “action for a money judgment” under Louisiana’s non-resident attachment statute carries significant consequences for state and federal commercial law. We believe re-examination is needed. Because we conclude that Louisiana’s Supreme Court is the appropriate authority to resolve the matter, we exercise the certification privilege granted by Rule XII of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Louisiana. I. STYLE OF THE CASE The style of the case we certify is Stemcor USA Inc. v. Cia Siderurgica do Para Cosipar, et al., No. 16-30984, on appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Stemcor USA, Inc. v. Am. Metals Trading, LLP, 199 F. Supp. 3d 1102, 1107 (E.D. La. 2016). Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * 2 Case: 16-30984 Document: 00514686940 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 No. 16-30984 II. STATEMENT OF FACTS The factual and procedural background of this case appears at Stemcor USA Inc., 895 F.3d at 377-78. III. QUESTION CERTIFIED We hereby certify, on our own motion, the following determinative question of law to the Supreme Court of Louisiana: Is a suit seeking to compel arbitration an “action for a money judgment” under Louisiana’s non-resident attachment statute, La. Code Civ. Proc. art. 3542? IV. CONCLUSION Should the Louisiana Supreme Court accept our request for an answer to this question, we disclaim any intent that the answer be confined to the precise form or scope of this certification. Any answer provided by the Louisiana Supreme Court will determine the issue on appeal in this case. Along with our certification, we transfer this case’s record and the appellate briefs. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
