USA v. Crockett Roddam, No. 15-41143 (5th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 15-41143 Document: 00513651952 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/25/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-41143 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 25, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CROCKETT JACOB RODDAM, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:14-CR-9-1 Before JONES, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Crockett Jacob Roddam has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Roddam has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 15-41143 Document: 00513651952 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/25/2016 No. 15-41143 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Roddam’s motion to substitute counsel is DENIED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.