United States v. Churchwell, No. 14-20351 (5th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseDefendant, employed as an Adjudication Manager for the Houston Passport Agency, appealed his conviction of two counts of aiding and abetting the making of a false statement in a passport violation. The court concluded that there was sufficient evidence to convict defendant; the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting lay testimony regarding defendant's conduct and behavior; even if it was error to admit the lay testimony, the error was harmless; and the prosecutor's statements during closing argument was not improper and, even if it were improper, defendant's substantial rights were not affected. Finally, the court concluded that defendant's above-Guidelines sentence of 42 months was procedurally and substantively reasonable. The court affirmed the judgment and sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.