USA v. Joshua Southerland, No. 13-30008 (5th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 13-30008 Document: 00512394649 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-30008 Summary Calendar October 2, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSHUA SOUTHERLAND, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:12-CR-21-1 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Joshua Southerland pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to failing to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Prior to his guilty plea, Southerland moved unsuccessfully to dismiss his indictment on the ground that Congress improperly delegated to the Attorney General the power to decide whether SORNA s registration requirements applied to sex offenders, like Southerland, who were * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-30008 Document: 00512394649 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/02/2013 No. 13-30008 convicted before SORNA went into effect. In his plea agreement, Southerland reserved the right to raise this issue on appeal. We have addressed and rejected previous challenges to SORNA based on the nondelegation doctrine. See United States v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 912, 917 (5th Cir. 2011); United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254, 262-64 (5th Cir. 2009). Southerland recognizes our precedent, but urges that Reynolds v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 975 (2012), calls into question its continued applicability. Reynolds, however, did not explicitly or implicitly overrule Johnson and Whaley; accordingly, we are bound by those decisions. See United States v. Short, 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.