USA v. Terry Pouncy, No. 12-31181 (5th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 23, 2013.
Download PDF
Case: 12-31181 Document: 00512352110 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 12-31181 Summary Calendar August 23, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. TERRY W. POUNCY, Defendant-Appellant Cons. w/ No. 12-31193 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RANDY L. RANDALL, Defendant-Appellant Cons. w/ No. 12-31194 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. REGINALD D. LEE, Defendant-Appellant Case: 12-31181 Document: 00512352110 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/23/2013 No. 12-31181 c/w No. 12-31193 c/w No. 12-31194 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:11-CR-317-6 USDC No. 5:11-CR-317-8 USDC No. 5:11-CR-317-12 Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Terry Pouncy on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pouncy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. The record does reveal two clerical errors in the judgment, which stated an offense of conviction as conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute [cocaine], where the indictment and the guilty plea recognized that offense of conviction as possession with intent to distribute cocaine. The judgment should be corrected to reflect that Pouncy was convicted of possession with intent to distribute. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. With respect to Count 8, the judgment should be corrected to reflect the right code number of 18 (rather than 21) U.S.C. ยง 924(c)(1). Id. Accordingly, Pouncy s counsel s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and as to Pouncy only (Case No. 12-31181) his APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2 Case: 12-31181 Document: 00512352110 Page: 3 Date Filed: 08/23/2013 No. 12-31181 c/w No. 12-31193 c/w No. 12-31194 42.2. His case is REMANDED for correction of the clerical errors pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
