Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Company, e, No. 12-10544 (5th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 1, 2013.

Download PDF
Case: 12-10544 Document: 00512749124 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 12-10544 August 28, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ERICA P. JOHN FUND, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Archidiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Funds, Inc., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, HALLIBURTON COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ LORI A. RUSSO, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY; DAVID J. LESAR, _________________________ Defendants-Appellants, ERNEST HACK, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff HALLIBURTON COMPANY; DAVID J. LESAR, Defendants-Appellants, __________________________ Case: 12-10544 Document: 00512749124 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/28/2014 No. 12-10544 POLAR INVESTMENT CLUB, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY; DAVID J. LESAR, Defendants-Appellants ________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas _________________________________________________ ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before DAVIS, GRAVES and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court, No. 13-317, Halliburton Co., et al. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. following the Court s grant of a Writ of Certiorari to consider our affirmance of the district court s judgment. The Supreme Court reversed our judgment and remanded this case to us for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Accordingly, we VACATE the district court judgment. We REMAND this case to the District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court s opinion. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.