Chester v. Thaler, No. 08-70023 (5th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CasePetitioner pled guilty to capital murder and was sentenced to death. Petitioner sought post-conviction relief from the Texas courts, alleging that he was mentally retarded, and his execution would therefore be unconstitutional. The Texas trial court and the Court of Criminal Appeals determined that petitioner was not mentally retarded. Petitioner subsequently applied for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 and the federal district court denied relief. The court held that the state's legal conclusions neither contradicted nor unreasonably applied federal law, nor were its factual conclusions unreasonable in light of the evidence presented in the state proceeding. Accordingly, the court affirmed the denial of habeas relief.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on June 11, 2013.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.