Collins v. Lubbock Police Dept, No. 08-10242 (5th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 08-10242 Summary Calendar December 23, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk BENNIE L. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUBBOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 5:05-CV-124 Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bennie Collins appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 claims against the Lubbock Police Department ( LPD ). He alleges that LPD officers took * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-10242 $6,335 from him when they pulled him over for a traffic violation and arrested him for possession of a switchblade. Collins has failed to raise, as an issue on appeal, the primary basis for the dismissal, which is that LPD is not subject to suit under Darby v. Pasadena Police Dep t, 939 F.2d 311, 313 (5th Cir. 1991). Although pro se briefs are afforded a liberal construction, even pro se litigants must brief the issues to preserve them. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Collins has failed to provide any legal or factual analysis of this issue, he has abandoned any challenge to the ruling. See id. Accordingly, we do not reach the other issues raised on appeal. The judgment is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.