Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), No. 22-1269 (4th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1269 RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS (BIA); CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES (CIS); CUSTOMS AND BORDER PATROL (CBP); STATE DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00117-JAG) Submitted: June 28, 2022 Decided: June 30, 2022 Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint against various federal agencies for lack of jurisdiction. We conclude that the court properly determined that Emrit’s case was not ripe because he asserted claims based on events that had not yet occurred. See South Carolina v. United States, 912 F.3d 720, 730 (4th Cir. 2019) (“[A] plaintiff’s claim is not ripe for judicial review if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
