In re: Maurice Glenn, No. 21-2099 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2099 In re: MAURICE GLENN, Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. (8:15-cv-03058-PX) Submitted: January 21, 2022 Before KING, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Glenn, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: April 19, 2022 PER CURIAM: Maurice Glenn petitions for an extraordinary writ; he seeks an investigation into alleged misconduct by judicial employees and review of Judicial Council orders denying Glenn’s complaints of judicial misconduct. Our authority to issue extraordinary writs under the All Writs Act “is only incidental to and in aid of [our] appellate jurisdiction, which Congress has given [Courts of Appeals] over district courts and administrative boards and agencies.” Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam) (citations omitted). The relief sought by Glenn is not available by way of extraordinary writ. Accordingly, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.