Cynthia Holmes v. Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P. A., No. 21-153 (4th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-153 C. HOLMES, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, M.D., a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes, Petitioner, v. HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A., Respondent. On Petition for Permission to Appeal. (2:20-cv-00234-BHH ) Submitted: November 23, 2021 Decided: November 29, 2021 Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cynthia C. Holmes, Petitioner Pro Se. Mary McFarland Caskey, Mary Cothonneau Eldridge, HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: C. Holmes petitions for permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) the district court’s orders: (1) adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying her motion to remand the case to the bankruptcy court, and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration of that order. The bankruptcy court has since granted Holmes’ motion to dismiss her bankruptcy case. Due to the dismissal of the underlying bankruptcy case, this court “is without the power to afford effective relief.” See Central States, Se. & Sw. Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transp., Inc., 841 F.2d 92, 96 (4th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we deny Holmes’ motion to exceed length limitations for the petition and deny the petition to appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.