Darrell Goss v. Bryan Stirling, No. 20-7835 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7835 DARRELL L. GOSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN P. STIRLING; CHARLES WILLIAMS; THOMAS ROBERTSON; ALYSON GLADWELL; STEPHANIE MARSHALL; OFFICER STANLEY TERRY; LIEUTENANT CLARISSA JONES; DEBORAH RICHTER; JENNIFER FRANKLIN, Mailroom Director; SERGEANT WARREN PEEK; VERDEIA HALL, Corporal; CHARLES CROSBY, Officer; CARLOS RIVERA, Officer; JUANITA MOSS; WILLIE SMITH; CHAPLAIN NEDENIA PARKER-BARBER; CANTEEN MANAGER GEORGIA YELDELL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:18-cv-03245-BHH) Submitted: January 12, 2022 Decided: May 18, 2022 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, CROWE LAFAVE LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN & DAVIS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Darrell L. Goss appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to several Defendants on his claims under the First and Eighth Amendments and dismissing with prejudice the remaining Defendants and claims against them under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goss v. Stirling, No. 6:18-cv-03245-BHH (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.