Raymond Aigbekaen v. Homewood Suites by Hilton, No. 20-7207 (4th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7207 RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON; ALAN MANANDAHAR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-02167-JKB) Submitted: March 26, 2021 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: April 2, 2021 PER CURIAM: Raymond Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Aigbekaen’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.