Alicia Gonzales v. Marshall University Board, No. 19-1928 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1928 ALICIA GONZALES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00235) Submitted: November 16, 2020 Decided: December 1, 2020 Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Amy C. Crossan, BOUCHILLON, CROSSAN & COLBURN, LC, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellant. Perry W. Oxley, David E. Rich, Eric D. Salyers, OXLEY RICH SAMMONS, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alicia Gonzales appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Marshall University Board of Governors on Gonzales’ complaint under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gonzales v. Marshall Univ. Bd. of Governors, No. 3:18-cv-00235 (S.D.W. Va. July 30, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.