John Burnley v. Alfred Durham, No. 19-1918 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1918 JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALFRED DURHAM, Chief of Police; UNKNOWN NAMED POLICE OFFICERS FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND; CITY OF RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF RICHMOND; DARSETTA M. COLEMAN; KEITH BROWN, Verizon Technician; COMCAST; VERIZON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00404-REP) Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 19, 2019 Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Rodgers Burnley, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Earl Hill, Jr., Wirt Peebles Marks, IV, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Meredith Macdonald Haynes, Harold Edward Johnson, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Rodgers Burnley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burnley v. Durham, No. 3:18-cv-00404-REP (E.D.V.A. Aug. 7, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.