Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 18-1676 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1676 NATHANIEL M. COSTLEY, SR., The Estate of Mary Jane Costley; THE ESTATE OF MARY JANE COSTLEY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, Individually and as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP; GREEN TREE LENDING; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendants - Appellees, and COUNTY WIDE HOME LOAN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-02488-ELH) Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018 Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa O. Martinez, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Henry Falkner Reichner, REED SMITH, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., personally and on behalf of the Estate of Mary Jane Costley, appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in his action alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667f (2012), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692– 1692p (2012), as well as claims of fraud, breach of contract, and conversion in connection with loans extended to his grandmother in 2006 and 2007, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Costley v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 1:13-cv-02488-ELH (D. Md. May 9, 2017, Nov. 20, 2017, & May 18, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.