Richard Lamb v. South Carolina DMV Office, No. 18-1593 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1593 RICHARD B. LAMB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV OFFICE; SFAA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND; KEVIN SHWEDO; WILLIAM C. WANNAMAKER; MARCIA ADAMS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-00552-DCN) Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard B. Lamb, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Richard B. Lamb appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. SC Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, No. 0:18-cv00552-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2