Brett Kimberlin v. Breitbart Holdings, No. 18-1413 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1413 BRETT KIMBERLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BREITBART HOLDINGS; LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; ANNE INGALLS; STEPHEN COOLEY; ESTATE OF JERRY BARNES; KENNETH TREGONING; ESTATE OF ANDREW BREITBART; STEPHEN BANNON; LARRY SOLOV; LARRY O’CONNER; CHUCK DEFEO; ALEXANDER MARLOW; BRANDON DARBY; ELIZABETH SHELD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-03588-GJH) Submitted: August 9, 2018 Decided: August 24, 2018 Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brett Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kimberlin v. Breitbart Holdings, No. 8:16-cv-03588-GJH (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.