Clark Philogene v. Data Networks, Inc., No. 18-1222 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1222 CLARK PHILOGENE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DATA NETWORKS, INC., Defendant - Appellee, and BRYAN HENNESSY; CRYSTAL RAY; TRINA COLIE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-01318-PWG) Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clark Philogene, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Matthew Branciforte, Brandon Robert Mita, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Clark Philogene appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), Philogene’s amended civil complaint against his former employer, Data Networks, Inc. In his amended complaint, Philogene alleged racial and national origin discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation claims, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Philogene v. Data Networks, Inc., No. 8:17-cv-01318-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 21, 2018 & entered Feb. 22, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.