Timothy E. Tweed v. Rappahannock Regional Jail, No. 18-1048 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1048 TIMOTHY E. TWEED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; JOSEPH HIGGS, JR., Official and Individual Capacity; PHIL GRIMES, Official and Individual Capacity; HUSTON NORRIS, Official and Individual Capacity; KALEN DONALDSON, Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01164-LO-MSN) Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Everette Tweed, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Timothy Everette Tweed appeals the district court’s orders: (1) granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging discharge in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2017); and denying Tweed’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tweed v. Rappahannock Reg’l Jail, No. 1:16-cv-01164-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2017 & Jan. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.