US v. Darryl Stuckey, No. 17-6620 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6620 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARRYL A. STUCKEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cr-00042-RWT-1) Submitted: September 27, 2017 Decided: September 29, 2017 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl A. Stuckey, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Brian Bender, Gregory Victor Davis, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Kelly O. Hayes, Joseph McFarlane, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland; Sean B. O’Connell, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Darryl A. Stuckey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for early termination of supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stuckey, No. 8:12-cr-00042-RWT-1 (D. Md. filed May 2, 2017, & entered May 3, 2017). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent Stuckey seeks vacatur of the restitution order entered at his original sentencing, his failure to raise any challenge to the order below precludes our review of his claim on appeal. See Pronomo v. United States, 814 F.3d 681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016) (explaining that, absent exceptional circumstances, this court generally declines to consider issues raised for first time on appeal). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.