Jamaal Gittens v. NC Department of Revenue, No. 17-2106 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2106 JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint in which he asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. NC Dep’t of Revenue, No. 3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.