US v. George Cabel, No. 16-7166 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7166 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GEORGE THOMAS CABEL, a/k/a PY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:97-cr-00173-TDS-1) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Thomas Cabel, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Thomas Cabel appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. * reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States v. 2016). legal before Cabel, No. 1:97-cr-00173-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. United Aug. 18, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although the district court granted Cabel’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Cabel’s sentence to the full extent he requested. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.