Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles Williams, No. 16-6895 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6895 MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHARLES WILLIAMS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA) Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Morris Speight-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his original 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and opening a new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending below. error. We reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, court. have we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.