George Cleveland, III v. Judge Daniel Hall, No. 16-6838 (4th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6838 GEORGE CLEVELAND, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUDGE DANIEL D. HALL, in his official capacity as Circuit Court Judge of South Carolina; KAREN C. RATIGAN, in her official capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:15-cv-04384-RBH) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, November 28, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. Cleveland v. Hall, No. 6:15-cv-04384-RBH (D.S.C. May 18, 2016). We grant Cleveland’s motion to accept as timely filed his informal brief, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.