Richard Asare v. Loretta Lynch, No. 16-1479 (4th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1479 RICHARD ASARE, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: November 21, 2016 Decided: November 23, 2016 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Karikari, KARIKARI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director, Song E. Park, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Richard Asare, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Asare’s motion to reconsider its decision upholding the Immigration Judge’s denial of his motion for a continuance. We have reviewed the administrative record and Asare’s claims, and find them to be without merit. discretion in the denial of We accordingly find no abuse of reconsideration, see Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009), and deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. (B.I.A. Mar. 31, 2016). See In re Asare We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
